Washington (Sep. 30)
Acting in accordance with sharp directives from President Truman to improve the plight of the displaced persons in Germany, especially tens of thousands of Jews, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower today ordered that lodgings for victims of the Nazis, partioularly Jews, are to be requisitioned without hesitation, it is reported here today from Frankfurt.
Gen. Eisenhower’s order, which followed by a day the disclosure by the White House that the President had criticized the handling of displaced Jews in a letter to the American commander in the European theatre, instructed military and civil officials to see to it that there is sufficient food and other necessities provided for the 100,000 Jews quartered in camps, so that they may be prepared for the winter.
The President’s letter, which was sent to Gen. Eisenhower together with a copy of a report by Earl G. Harrison, U.S. representative on the Intergovernmental Committee for Refugees, drew the General’s particular attention to a section of the report in which Harrison declares that “as matters now stand, we appear to be treating the Jews as the Nazis treated them, except that we do not exterminate them.”
Criticizing the failure of the military to carry out the decisions on treatment of displaced persons reached at Potsdam, Mr. Truman called for removal of the DP’s from camps into decent houses until they can be repatriated or evacuated. He ordered that “these houses should be requisitioned from the German civil population.” stressing that this was “one way to implement the Potsdam policy that the German people ‘cannot escape responsibility for what they have brought upon themselves.”
The President’s letter also revealed that he had communicated with the British Government “in an effort to have the doors of Palestine opened to such of these displaced persons as wish to go there.” The text of the letter follows:
“I have received and considered the report of Mr. Earl G. Harrison, our representative of the Intergovernmental Committee on Refugees, upon his mission to inquire into the condition and needs of displaced persons in Germany who may be stateless or non-repatriable, particularly Jews. I am sending you a copy of that report. I have also had a long conference with him on the same subject-matter.
“While Mr. Harrison makes due allowance for the fact that during the early days of liberation the huge task of mass repatriation required main attention, he reports conditions which now exist and which require prompt remedy. These conditions, I know, are not in conformity with policies promulgated by SHAEF, now combined displaced persons executive. But they are what actually exists in the field. In other words, the policies are not being carried out by some of your subordinate officers.
“For example, Military Government officers have been authorized, and even directed, to requisition billeting facilities from the German population for the benefit of displaced persons. Yet, from this report, this has not been done on any wide scale. Apparently it is being taken for granted that all displaced persons, irrespestive of their former persecution or the likelihood that their repatriation or resettlement will be delayed, must remain in camps–many of which are overcrowded and heavily guarded. Some of these camps are the very ones where those people were herded together, starved, tortured and made to witness the death of their fellow-inmates and friends and relatives. The announced policy has been to give such persons preference over the German civilian population in housing. But the practice seems to be quite another thing.
“We must intensify our efforts to get these people out of camps and into decent houses until they can be repatriated or evacuated. These houses should be requisitioned form the German civilian population. That is one way to implement the Potsdam policy that the German people ‘cannot escape responsibility for what they have brought upon themselves.’
“We quote this paragraph with particular reference to the Jews among the displaced persons; ‘As matters now stand, we appear to be treating the Jews as the Nazis treated them, except that we do not exterminate them. They are in concentration camps in large numbers under our military guard instead of S.S. troops One is led to wonder whether the German people, seeing this, are not supposing that we are following, or at least condoning, Nazi policy.’ You will find in the report other illustrations of what I mean.
“I hope you will adopt the suggestion that a more extensive plan of field visitation by appropriate Army group headquarters be instituted, so that the humane policies which have been enunciated are not permitted to be ignored in the field. Most of the conditions now existing would quickly be remedied if through inspection tours they came to your attention or to the attention of your supervisory officers.
“I know you will agree with me that we have a particular responsibility toward these victims of persecution and tyranny who are in our zone. We must make clear to the German people that we thoroughly abhor the Nazi policies of hatred and persecution. We have no better opportunity to demonstrate this than by the manner in which we ourselves actually treat the survivors remaining in Germany. I hope you will report to me as soon as possible the steps you have been able to take to clean up the conditions mentioned in the report.
“I am communicating directly with the British Government in an effort to have the doors of Palestine opened to such of these displaced persons as wish to go there.”