A Canadian human-rights tribunal has ruled that a newspaper columnist did not violate anti-hate laws when he accused Jews of propagandizing the Holocaust for profit.
The Canadian Jewish Congress had filed the complaint against columnist Doug Collins, who wrote three years ago that Jews had orchestrated a “propaganda exercise” about the Holocaust.
In a 143-page decision handed down Wednesday, the tribunal, based in the province of British Columbia, ruled that the column was anti-Semitic, but that it did not constitute hate literature.
The ruling said that Collins’ column “presents Jews in a negative light, as powerful propagandists and profiteers, and it depicts, in grossly inaccurate terms, the extent of their victimization in the Holocaust.”
But the tribunal found that the column, offensive as it appeared, was not “hateful or contemptuous in the sense contemplated by” the British Columbia Human Rights Code.
Civil libertarians hailed the decision as a victory for free speech, even while disagreeing with the opinions expressed in the column.
Michael Elterman, a spokesman for the Canadian Jewish Congress, said he was disappointed with the ruling, but added that it contained some important and positive aspects.
The ruling “recognized the pernicious effect that publication of hateful statements has on our society,” Elterman said.
“We expect that the decision will encourage the media, regardless of whether they be mainstream or otherwise, to act responsibly when publishing material that is likely to expose people to hatred or contempt.”
The Archive of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency includes articles published from 1923 to 2008. Archive stories reflect the journalistic standards and practices of the time they were published.
