JERUSALEM (Aug. 26)
Reports of the death of a gradual Israeli-Palestinian cease-fire plan may be premature — but not by much.
Indeed, the initial skepticism that greeted the “Gaza/Bethlehem First” plan seems to have been borne out by the events of the past week.
Israeli Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer insisted this week that the plan was not being put into deep freeze, despite a decision to hold off a possible Israeli army withdrawal from Hebron at least until after the High Holidays, which begin in early September.
Meetings on ways to progress with the cease-fire plan will still be held this week, the Defense Minister’s office said Sunday.
But in adopting the army’s recommendation not to pull troops from Hebron for the time being, Ben-Eliezer cited security warnings and concern that terrorist groups there might exploit the holiday period to launch attacks.
Comments from the Israel Defense Force chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Moshe Ya’alon, publicly confirmed the army’s point of view — and the unlikelihood of the cease-fire plan actually working.
Addressing a conference of rabbis on Sunday, Ya’alon said a unilateral Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be seen as submission to terrorism. He added that the Palestinian Authority’s adoption of terrorism as a tactic reflected its refusal to accept Israel’s existence.
Israel must decisively defeat the intifada so the Palestinians don’t conclude that terrorism pays, Ya’alon said.
Ben-Eliezer also noted that Israeli troops could withdraw only if it was clear that the Palestinian security forces taking responsibility for maintaining order were capable of doing so.
Israeli security officials gave a negative review of Palestinian efforts to halt terror attacks in the Gaza Strip in the week since the accord was signed, the Israeli daily Ha’aretz reported.
Israel has been waiting for evidence that the Palestinians are serious about stopping terrorism in Gaza, where the Palestinian Authority security apparatus is largely intact. Israeli military officials said P.A. security organs have yet to take serious steps to crack down on Palestinian terrorist groups, Ha’aretz reported.
For his part, Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said the Israelis are stalling.
“What I can describe the situation to be is non-movement, as if the consistent position of the Israeli government is to keep the status quo,” Erekat was quoted as saying.
In Bethlehem, the other area where the accord is already in effect, Palestinian security forces have displayed good intentions, according to Ha’aretz.
But the Palestinian security apparatus in the West Bank faces a formidable task of rebuilding physical structures, personnel and morale. Palestinians say it will take them time to rebuild their security forces before they can take effective measures on the ground.
Israeli skeptics say that is the Palestinians’ way of signalling that they will continue to allow terror attacks, while disclaiming responsibility.
In the meantime, the Palestinian Authority’s interior minister, Gen. Abdel Razek Yehiyeh, called on Palestinian militias to rethink their strategy of armed struggle. He urged them to abide by P.A. decisions and the rule of law, and called on Palestinian factions to renew a dialogue toward formulating a united strategy.
But the militant groups, ranging from the fundamentalist Hamas and Islamic Jihad to the Al Aksa Brigades of P.A. President Yasser Arafat’s Fatah movement, rejected any cease-fire and urged continued warfare against Israel.
Earlier, the “Intifada leadership council” issued a statement in the West Bank calling on the Palestinian Authority to cease security contacts with Israel, including the cease-fire plan.
Marwan Barghouti, head of Fatah in the West Bank, told a Kuwaiti newspaper that he opposes agreements with Israel unless it ends its “occupation, recognizes an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital” and accepted the the “Right of Return” for millions of Palestinian refugees and their descendants.
Currently in an Israeli jail, Barghouti is slated to go on trial next month for allegedly masterminding terrorist attacks that killed scores of Israelis.
Violence — and Israel’s anti-terror operations — continued this week, albeit at a slightly slower pace.
Four armed Palestinians were killed in weekend clashes with Israeli troops. Two died while attempting to infiltrate an Israeli settlement in the Gaza strip last Friday night, while the other two died in a firefight with Israelis soldiers patrolling in the West Bank city of Jenin on Saturday.
On Sunday, Israeli troops nabbed a suspected suicide bomber and two alleged accomplices near Jenin.
Israeli troops continued arrest operations throughout the West Bank. Among those detained was another Palestinian allegedly connected to the Jerusalem-based Hamas cell captured a week ago that is blamed for at least eight terrorist attacks, including the July 31 Hebrew University bombing.
On Monday, Israel arrested local Hamas leader Jamal Abu Haji during a raid in the Jenin refugee camp. In Tulkarm, troops demolished the home of a Palestinian suspected of involvement in terrorist attacks that killed eight people.
Seven Israeli Arabs have been arrested on charges that they assisted in an Aug. 4 suicide bombing that killed nine people and wounded 50. According to information released for publication Monday, seven members of a Galilee clan were arrested several weeks ago and have confessed to allegations regarding the attack in northern Israel.
Two of the principal suspects, Ibrahim and Yassin Bakri, allegedly helped the Palestinian bomber choose a bus to bomb and drove him to the stop where he boarded. Other family members allegedly gave the bomber shelter.
Israeli army plans to demolish the eastern Jerusalem homes of two suicide bombers were delayed Sunday when the terrorists’ families appealed to the military prosecutor in the West Bank.
In the Dec. 1 attack, the two bombers blew themselves up among Saturday night revelers on Jerusalem’s Ben Yehuda pedestrian mall, killing 11 people and wounding more than 180.
Whether the “Gaza/Bethlehem First” plan has any chance of preventing such attacks in the future remains anybody’s guess.