The opening verse of Vayikra, the third book of the Torah, tells us that God first called to Moses and then communicated to him a specific message concerning the Sanctuary. Why this double language of “calling” first and then “speaking” afterwards? Why not cut to the chase: “And the Lord spoke to Moses from the Tent of Meeting”?
The Talmudic sage [Yoma 4b] explains that the Torah is giving us a lesson in good manners: before someone commands another to do something, he must first ask permission to give the order. He even suggests that before someone begins speaking to another, one must ascertain that the person wishes to hear what he has to say. God Himself follows these laws of etiquette.
Ramban (Nahmanides) takes a completely opposite view, limiting this double language specifically to the Sanctuary: “this (seemingly superfluous language of first calling and then speaking) is not used elsewhere; it is only used here because Moses would not otherwise have been permitted to enter the Tent of Meeting, in such close proximity to the place where the Almighty was to be found.” From this second perspective, it is Moses who must first be summoned by God and receive permission before he dares enter the sacred Tent of Meeting.
Candlelighting, Readings
Shabbat Candles: 6:45 p.m.
Torah: Lev. 1:1-5:26; Numbers 28:9-28:15; Ex. 12:1-20
Haftarah: Ezekiel 45:16-46:18
Havdalah: 7:45 p.m.
This latter interpretation seems closest to the biblical text, since the very last verses in the Book of Exodus specifically tell us that whenever a cloud covered the Sanctuary, Moses was prevented from entering the Tent of Meeting and communicating with the Divine. Hence, Leviticus opens with God summoning Moses into the Tent of Meeting, apparently signaling the departure of the cloud and the Divine permission for Moses to hear God’s words.
This scenario helps us understand God’s relationship — and lack thereof — with the Israelites in general and with Moses in particular. You may recall that the initial commandment to erect a Sanctuary was in order for the Divine Presence to dwell in the midst of the Israelites. Such closeness between God and the Israelites would have been a fitting conclusion to the exodus from Egypt.
Tragically, the Israelites then sin with the Golden Calf and God immediately informs them that “I cannot go up in your midst because you are a stiff-necked nation, lest I destroy you on the way.” Only if the Israelites are worthy can God dwell in their midst. If they forego their true vocation as a “sacred nation and a kingdom of priest-teachers” while God is in such close proximity to them, then this God of truth will have to punish and even destroy them. He will therefore now keep His distance from them, retaining His “place,” as it were, in the supernal, transcendent realms and sending His “angel-messenger” to lead them in their battles to conquer the Promised Land.
As a physical symbol of God’s concealment or partial absence (hester panim), Moses takes the Tent of Meeting and removes its central position in the Israelite encampment, to a distance of 2,000 cubits away. He then remonstrates with God, arguing that the Almighty had promised to show His love by means of His Divine Name, to reveal His Divine attributes and to accept Israel as His special nation. In other words, Moses argues that God — and not an angel-messenger — must reveal His Divine ways and lead Israel [Rashbam on Ex. 33:13].
God responds, “I, Myself, and not an angel-messenger … I shall bring you (Moses, but not the nation) to your ultimate resting place.” Moses is not satisfied, and argues that God must lead not only Moses but also the nation, otherwise, “do not take us out of this desert.” Finally, God agrees that although He cannot be in the midst of the nation, He can and will lead them, stepping in whenever necessary to make certain that Israel will never disappear and will eventually return to their homeland.
God may not be completely manifest, and Israel remains a work-in-progress with God behind a cloud and incommunicado. Our nation, albeit imperfect, still serves as witnesses that the God of love and compassion exists and orchestrates historical redemption through Israel. God is “incorporated” incorporealized, in Israel, the people and the land.
What God leaves behind even when He is in a cloud are the two newly chiseled tablets of stone — His Divine Torah with the human input of the Oral Law — as well as His Thirteen Attributes. And when individuals internalize these attributes — imbuing their hearts, minds and souls with love, compassion, kindness, grace and peace — they cause God to become manifest, enabling them to communicate with God “face to face” like Moses. Then the cloud disappears, and Moses is enabled to teach and understand God’s Torah.
And so Vayikra opens when God perceives that Moses has reached the highest spiritual level achievable by mortals, the cloud is removed from the Tent of the Meeting and God invites Moses to enter it and receive more of those Divine Emanations which comprise our Bible.
Support the New York Jewish Week
Our nonprofit newsroom depends on readers like you. Make a donation now to support independent Jewish journalism in New York.
Rabbi Shlomo Riskin is chancellor of Ohr Torah Stone and chief rabbi of Efrat.
The New York Jewish Week brings you the stories behind the headlines, keeping you connected to Jewish life in New York. Help sustain the reporting you trust by donating today.
