Bush aides play down proposed meetingRon KampeasArab officials want to discuss borders, Jerusalem and refugees, but Bush aides insist that a proposed Middle East gathering would only focus on Palestinian institution building. Published: 07/24/2007 WASHINGTON (JTA) -- It's a Miss Manners nightmare: an invitation with a gift registry and a demand for pledges, but no set date -- and not even a real promise of a wedding. Palestinian and Arab officials say the proposed gathering should address some of the final-status issues that they see as critical to arriving at even an interim agreement: borders, Jerusalem and refugees. But in discussions with American Jewish communal leaders, Bush administration officials insist that the meeting will focus only on Palestinian institution building. The problem with creating such low expectations is that Bush hopes for a breakthrough that would bolster Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, whose political ratings have bottomed out. To that end he wants Arab states to proffer some level of recognition of Israel ahead of the meeting, but without more of a carrot it seems unlikely that they will deliver. "The level of the meeting right now is photo opportunities and handshakes," Qaddura Fares, the leader of the Fatah prisoners' association who is close to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, told JTA in an interview. "Reality dictates that such a conference should address the outline of a peace agreement. I really don’t understand what are the objectives of Israel and the United States." Jordan's King Abdullah II spent Tuesday asking President Bush and U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice what they wanted out of the meeting. The king "stressed that a just and lasting solution based on international resolutions and a two-state solution will contribute to solving other problems faced by the region's people," his embassy said in a midday statement. Disappointment in the United States and Israeli reluctance to discuss final-status issues were the reasons Jordan and Egypt downgraded visits by their foreign ministers to Israel this week from what was to have been historic Arab League outreach to yet more regional courtesy calls. The confusion and gap in expectations stem from mixed signals in how Bush rolled out the idea. In a White House setting on July 16, with Rice looking on, the president said participants would "review the progress that has been made toward building Palestinian institutions. They will look for innovative and effective ways to support further reform. And they will provide diplomatic support for the parties in their bilateral discussions and negotiations, so that we can move forward on a successful path to a Palestinian state." Yet literally within minutes of the address, top Bush aides were telling reporters that the meeting would narrowly focus on Palestinian institution building. In a conference call a day later, Elliott Abrams, Bush's deputy national security adviser, was reassuring Jewish leaders along the same lines, emphasizing that the event was merely a "meeting" and not a "conference." "The word 'meeting' was used several times," one of the participants told JTA. "Relaunching the Arab League initiative was a welcome first step," he said. "Now Arab nations should build on this initiative." But Arab states -- especially Saudi Arabia, which was behind the revivification of the Arab League initiative -- want more before they commit to attending the meeting. David Makovksy, a senior analyst with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said what would and wouldn't be discussed in the meeting was still under consideration. The Bush administration and Israel were still open to expanding the meeting's parameters, he said. One signal was that Rice had not even set a firm date for the meeting. "Unauthorized outposts should be removed and settlement expansion ended," Bush said in his speech, his strongest call in years to contain settlements. |