<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>Arab journalists indicted for violating censor</title>
    <link>http://www.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/arab-jounalists-indicted-for-violating-censor/</link>
    <description>Two eastern Jerusalem journalists were indicted for reporting on the start of Israel&apos;s ground operation in Gaza before gaining clearance.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>moster@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-01-13T;20:40:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Arthur Waskoiw</title>
      <link>Awaskow@shalomctr.org</link>
      <description>The comment above was somehow published in connection with  the wrong article. It is now available, as was intended, in connection with the correct one.&#8212;AW</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment above was somehow published in connection with  the wrong article. It is now available, as was intended, in connection with the correct one.&#8212;AW
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-02-09T;22:54:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Arthur Waskoiw</title>
      <link>Awaskow@shalomctr.org</link>
      <description>JTA&#8217;s  phrase &#8220;collided with&#8221; about the Free Gaza Movement&#8217;&#8217;s boat carrying humanitarian supplies is an evasive anti&#45;news non&#45;description: An israeli Navy ship rammed the boat carrying humanitarian supplies to Gaza and forced it to return to port elsewhere. .

 

Those who recite the mantra, &#8220;Israel has the right to defend itself against rocket attacks&#8221;  are right, but they ignore the question, defend itself HOW?&amp;nbsp; Would the cease&#45;fire have been renewed if Israel had cance]ed the embargo/ blockade on civllan commerce with Gaza?&amp;nbsp;  What would have been the results had Hamas escalated the small&#45;boat operation as a form of resistance to the blockade, instead of sending rockets?&amp;nbsp; Both governments chose miliitary responses when they could have chosen nonviolent ones.&amp;nbsp; 


&#45;&#45; Rabbi Arthur Waskow, Shalom Center</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JTA&#8217;s  phrase &#8220;collided with&#8221; about the Free Gaza Movement&#8217;&#8217;s boat carrying humanitarian supplies is an evasive anti-news non-description: An israeli Navy ship rammed the boat carrying humanitarian supplies to Gaza and forced it to return to port elsewhere. .
<br />
 
<br />
Those who recite the mantra, &#8220;Israel has the right to defend itself against rocket attacks&#8221;  are right, but they ignore the question, defend itself HOW?&nbsp; Would the cease-fire have been renewed if Israel had cance]ed the embargo/ blockade on civllan commerce with Gaza?&nbsp;  What would have been the results had Hamas escalated the small-boat operation as a form of resistance to the blockade, instead of sending rockets?&nbsp; Both governments chose miliitary responses when they could have chosen nonviolent ones.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
-- Rabbi Arthur Waskow, Shalom Center
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-02-09T;22:54:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
