<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Articles</title>
    <link>http://www.jta.org/news/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>zsilberman@washingtonjewishweek.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2012</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2012-02-09T22:54:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

        <item>
      <title>Don&#8217;t write off the intermarried</title>
      <link>http://www.jta.org/news/article/2007/02/12/15267/intermarriagegood</link>
      <guid>http://www.jta.org/site/intermarriagegood/#When:10:00:01Z</guid>
      <description>
      
                  The community should respond positively and inclusively to intermarried families, write Edmund Case and Micah Sachs of interfaithfamilies.com.
              
      </description>
      <dc:subject>Opinion</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-02-12T10:00:01-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    
    
    </channel>
</rss>
