Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s second resignation appears to be his final zigzag for now.
Two weeks after his whopping electoral defeat at the hands of Likud leader Ariel Sharon, Barak, the Labor Party’s leader, reversed his reversal of his election night resignation, informing Sharon that he would not serve as defense minister in a unity government but would indeed resign.
Political observers say the move will probably ease Labor’s way into a unity government under Sharon, though the party will now enter a hectic period as it prepares to elect a new leader.
Several important Labor figures who support a unity government had threatened to vote against the move if Barak was involved.
In a bitter letter, Barak accused Sharon of failing to live up to his own pledge that the two would collaborate in a unity government in a spirit of mutual trust. That spirit had been shattered, Barak said, because Sharon had made clear that he expected to decide policy autocratically and keep Labor out of core decision making.
Barak referred obliquely to Sharon’s determination to bring far-right politicians into his government, in defiance of Barak’s demand that these groups be kept out if Labor joins.
However, political observers say the main reason Barak decided to quit was the mounting wave of disaffection – in Labor and the country at large – when he backtracked from his election-night resignation.
During his term, Barak was accused of constant policy shifts that undermined his credibility. Just days after announcing his resignation on Feb. 6, Barak insisted on running Labor’s unity negotiations with Likud. It soon emerged that Barak intended to lead Labor into the unity government and take the No. 2 spot of defense minister.
Barak argued that the move was mandated by the national interest, even though his own personal and political interests would be better served by retiring from political life for now.
Open rebellion soon erupted in Labor. Major party figures spoke out publicly and harshly against Barak’s “zigzagging.”
Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami wrote to Barak and accused him of unethical behavior that prejudiced the fundamental morality of the Israeli political process.
Haifa Mayor Amram Mitzna, one of Barak’s closest friends in politics, wrote him an open letter demanding that he immediately implement his resignation.
An influential liberal, political scientist Shlomo Avineri of the Hebrew University, went on television to add his voice to the growing chorus of Barak critics.
Significantly, the critics came from both the pro- and anti-unity camps within Labor.
Knesset Speaker Avraham Burg, who favors the unity option, urged Barak to step down.
Interior Minister Haim Ramon, who also favors unity, went to Sharon’s ranch in the Negev to state that he would only join a unity government if it didn’t include Barak.
Ramon and his allies gave the Labor Party’s Central Committee a proposed slate of ministers for the unity government, pointedly excluding Barak.
The committee had been slated to meet this week but Barak postponed the session, realizing that it was shaping up as an impeachment session against him.
Barak began working the phones furiously, speaking with individual committee members and explaining to them why the country needed him as defense minister in these troubled times. Barak also met with groups of committee members to make the same pitch.
“If only he had talked to us like this when he was premier, perhaps he would still be premier,” one member noted wryly on television, alluding to what many have described as Barak’s perfunctory and high-handed attitude to party activists during his tenure.
On Tuesday, the beleaguered Barak closeted himself with his closest political advisers, and by late evening it was clear a resignation was in the works. The letter to Sharon was released close to midnight, and a resignation from the Labor leadership followed soon after.
Labor Party Secretary-General Ra’anan Cohen said he would consult with Shimon Peres and other key figures before submitting a slate of ministers to Labor’s Central Committee. Likud has said defense, foreign affairs and five other portfolios are available for Labor.
In his letter to Sharon, Barak wrote that he still favor the unity option in principle, provided that a way can be found to collaborate in making policy. Labor’s central committee is likely to endorse the party’s entry into a unity government if acceptable terms can be negotiated.
However, key figures in Labor’s dovish wing, including Justice Minister Yossi Beilin and Ben-Ami, are implacably opposed to such a step. They argue that Labor would serve as little more than a fig leaf for Sharon’s allegedly anti- peace policies.
Labor’s participation in the government, they say, would blur the distinction between the two large parties and weaken Labor’s ability to make its case to the voters in the next election.
They further argue that leftist voters would abandon Labor for the more dovish Meretz Party, which has declined Sharon’s invitation to join a unity government.
As to the leadership battle, Burg and Communications Minister Binyamin Ben- Eliezer have already declared, while Ramon and Ben-Ami are weighing their prospects.
The Archive of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency includes articles published from 1923 to 2008. Archive stories reflect the journalistic standards and practices of the time they were published.
