Congressional hearings to obtain testimony from the Coca-Cola Export Corporation were urged today by Rep. Seymour Halpern, ranking Republican member of the House Subcommittee on International Trade, as part of a drive to strengthen anti-boycott provisions of the export control act.
In a letter to Secretary of Commerce John T. Connor, Rep. Halpern charged that the Coca-Cola Company submitted to Arab boycott pressures because important provisions were omitted last year from the legislation adopted. He announced that he had studied the Coca-Cola case and “decided to institute legal action by amendment to revive the deleted language and provide potency and teeth to the law. “
Rep. Halpern asserted that “despite assurances by the Departments of Commerce and State that the non-mandatory provisions” that would discourage American commercial vulnerability to the Arab boycott were adequate, Coca-Cola and other American companies continue to be subjected to “Arab dictation as to trading with Israel. “
“Inadequacy in the wording of the law is forcing companies to comply with the Arab intrusion into American foreign trade and they camouflage such submission as the Coca-Cola Company has done, ” he stated. He recalled that a warning was sounded during last year’s Congressional debate “that just such a situation would ensue unless a specific measure prohibiting compliance with foreign boycotts was retained. “
The Congressman asked for a “detailed and comprehensive report on why gaps and loopholes in the anti-boycott law have emerged despite assurances to the contrary given to Congress when we reluctantly agreed to accept the weakened version of the bill recommended by the Executive Department. ” It was learned that a number of other subcommittee members supported the Halpern proposal for strengthening the anti-boycott law. If hearings are called, representatives of other corporations in addition to Coca-Cola may be asked to testify.
The Archive of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency includes articles published from 1923 to 2008. Archive stories reflect the journalistic standards and practices of the time they were published.