The dogma of the “Aryan” race, which recently has burst like a shell upon an astonished world, though formulated on a view of racial affinities fundamentally obsolete and a biased interpretation of archaeological fact, with the aid of the mystic symbols of the swastika, the arm raised in salute and a Messianic leader, has swept Germany off her feet. And it has accomplished this feat by setting up an ideal which recalls the ancient glories of the Germanic peoples in a period of political and economic depression, and holds out a promise of their revival through a racial regeneration.
It is unfortunate but true, that an ideal theory which can mould facts to its purpose holds the superior strategic position.
PUBLIC IMPATIENT WITH EXACT PROBE
The populace is ever impatient of the impartial attitude of a scientific investigation of fact, which must often, by the qualification and limitation of its conclusions owing to imperfect knowledge, provides a check rather than a spur to immediate action. In Germany, any who in their teaching might have been able to criticize the officially accepted view of racial origins and character of the German people, have now been forbidden to lecture on race on the ground that they are unfitted to meddle in an affair of so great practical moment.
Happily such restrictions do not run outside Germany, and although the anthropologist is not concerned with political propaganda as such, when racial theory is invoked in support of social and political action, the basis of argument must be such as will stand the test of scientific examination. The “Aryan” race doctrine as now held in Germany rests upon concepts, assumptions and theories hitherto generally regarded as untenable or discredited, and until recently accepted only by a few.
CONCEPTS FAMILIAR PRODUCT OF WRITERS
Mainly they were familiar as the stock-in-trade of popular writers and semi-journalistic publicists during and after the War. Notwithstanding their popular vogue and certain repercussions in the political world, scientific opinion had not been disposed to regard these concepts with any great degree of concern until their adoption as one of the main driving forces in the Nazi movement attracted a more widely diffused attention.
It was disastrous for Germany that the first step she elected to take in national regeneration through racial integration should have assumed a form which alienated liberal opinion throughout the whole world, at a time when the racial theory upon which it was based was neither well nor widely known.
ARGUMENT CARRIES OWN REFUTATION
The crude statement of Nazi argument for discrimination against the Jews on the ground of racial inferiority appeared absurd and almost carried its refutation with it. Apart from the impossibility of analyzing the culture of modern Germany in terms of the racial, elements of her populationâ€”a task from which even the most rash of racial psychologists might well shrinkâ€”it was shown time and again that the unquestioned eminence of Germany in the arts and sciences was due in no inconsiderable measure to her nationals of Jewish extraction and descent.
It is difficult for an onlooker to appreciate the attitude of mind which can so far run counter to the logic of facts as to impute racial inferiority to the Jew. It has all the appearance of the crudest race prejudice.
TYPE LIKENED TO HEINE’S CAMEL
Germany, however, with a thoroughness that is characteristic, especially in its lack of humor, justifies her action with an appeal to first principles. The Jewish type and Jewish mentality, with its proclivity to Socialism and internationalism, it is argued, is incompatible with the German type. But this German type is an ideal type, evolved, like the camel in Heine’s story, from the Teutonic inner consciousness and projected into the past, as so often happens with an ideal. It is, in fact, the familiar illusion of the Golden Age; and race prejudice has been transformed into an inevitable measure of purification in the endeavor to recreate a hypothetical ancient German character and culture.
Needless to say, this is not the German view; and confirmation of the conception of a Germanic type, embodying all the virtues of a superman, is found in the evidence of archaeology and racial history.
CITES HITLER’S ‘MEIN KAMPF’
Herr Hitler himself affirms in “Mein Kamp” that the Aryans alone among the peoples of the world have been “founders of culture,” and another prominent official of the Reich, Dr. Frank, is reported to have declared that from the substance of the Germanic race have issued the highest achievements of mankind, so that it might be considered the duty of the entire human race to safeguard this basic element.
This may come as a surprise to those who are not familiar with certain lines of argument in the racial question. It is a view which derives from the middle of the last century and the theories of the Comte de Gobineau, in which the Aryans, the white races par excellence, were regarded in their mission to mankind at large as only a little lower than the angels.
MODERN MODELS OF ‘ARYAN’ RACE
Briefly, the German doctrine of the “Aryan” race is that the tall, long-headed, fair-complexioned. Nordic peoples of northern Europe are the modern representatives of the original “Aryans.” To this race is due the high standard of culture found throughout the civilized world. Not only is this true in antiquity, in the civilizations of Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Mediterranean and so forth, but even the contribution to culture of Romance countries in modern times is to be attributed to descendants of the Nordic race. They were endowed with certain bodily characters, which represent the highest evolution of the human form; and in addition they possessed, as a racial inheritance, certain outstanding mental qualities.
It was in virtue of these physical and mental characters that they became the ruling classes in most ancient and modern societies. Wherever the Nordic strain is mixed with other breeds, it is said, it deteriorates. The aim of the State, therefore, must be to preserve the purity, integrity and dominance of the Aryan race, biologically, socially and politically.
EARLIEST ‘ARYANS’ PROTO-NORDICS?
It would be beyond the present purpose to enter into a detailed examination of these interpretations of ethnological, archaeological and historical fact, or to weigh the probabilities that the earliest “Aryan”-speaking people were Proto-Nordics, who carried their tongue to the other races of Europe.
That the Nordics were a far wandering people who irrupted into many lands is unquestioned; but as nomads their early culture was crude, and the people they conquered must almost invariably have been of a higher culture than themselves. But whatever their cultural status, a strict anthropometric measure applied to the modern population of Germany would find true Nordics in all their racial purity in an embarrassingly small minority.
DOGMA COULD NOT STAND TEST
That Germany has adopted a highly colored interpretation of history, which in the greater part of its detail would not stand the test of a moment’s impartial examination, is a matter of lesser import beside the fact that, by the forcible imposition of certain views on race and racial history, assumption has been taken as proof; and research and its results, unless ‘orthodox,’ have been banned on a number of questions such as racial heredity, racial admixture, the relation of race, mentality and culture, and the like, upon which science would hesitate to pronounce finally in the light of the evidence available.
Such dogmatic assumptions, unfortunately, have their attraction for the political doctrinaire and the agitator; and it is perhaps to be regretted, therefore, that the International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences did not see its way to promote investigation into such racial problems on broad lines. The machinery may seem overweighty; but at least the truth would have been made available in authoritative form to all.