Much of the Jewish Oscar buzz is focused on director Joseph Cedar’s “Beaufort” and the chances of an Israeli film picking up an Academy Award for the first time.
But another Jewish themed film — the Austrian-made â€œCounterfeiters” — is also up for foreign-language Oscar honors, along with three other movies.
Set in 1943, the film probes the moral dilemmas facing a special group of Jewish concentration camp inmates in a little-known and remarkable episode of Word War II.
As the Nazis realize that the war is going against them, they try one more ploy — to wreck the economies of Britain and the United States with massive amounts of perfectly counterfeited pounds, sterling and dollars. Under the codename â€œOperation Bernard,â€ the Germans comb concentration camps and put together a team of more than 100 skilled Jewish printers, photographers and engravers.
In Sachsenhausen, the prisoners are placed in two completely isolated barracks, dubbed â€œThe Golden Cage,â€ where they are given soft beds, good food, civilian clothes, first-class equipment and piped-in music.
Heading the team is Salomon Sorowitch, a character based on one Salomon Smolianoff, a Russian-born Jew nicknamed â€œSally,â€ who lived high in the Berlin of the 1920s and early 1930s as â€œThe King of the Counterfeiters.â€
Faced with the choice of producing pound notes so perfect that even the Bank of England accepts them as real, or instant death, Sorowitch does the Nazisâ€™ bidding.
By the end of the war, the Sachsenhausen team had turned out 134 million pounds, three times the amount of British currency reserves, and was getting close to producing equally perfect dollar bills.
In the film, director Stefan Ruzowitzky does not draw Sorowitch, portrayed by Karl Markovics, as just a craven collaborator. Sorowitch protects a fellow prisoner who is trying to sabotage the operation, and uses his skills to get medicine for an ill inmate.
â€œCounterfeitersâ€ retains the tension of a top thriller, but it goes deeper than that. It probes a haunting moral question — given a chance at life, even temporary life, at the price of aiding the enemy, what path will a man choose?
The actual Smolianoff survived the war and soon resumed his old occupation, adding the â€œrediscoveryâ€ of Old Master paintings to his repertoire. He died in Argentina in the 1960s.
The filmâ€™s ending, building on hearsay evidence, has Sorowitch after liberation toting a suitcase full of fake currency and heading for Monte Carlo, where he purposely loses the entire fortune at the gaming tables.
Director-writer Ruzowitzkyâ€™s background and motivation is as interesting as the movie itself.
The Viennese filmmakerâ€™s grandparents on both sides were Nazis or Nazi sympathizers, who, like most Austrians of the war and post-war generation saw themselves more as victims than perpetrators of the German atrocities.
â€œMy grandparents would acknowledge to me the facts of the Holocaust, but considered it a collateral damage to the war,â€ Ruzowitzky said during a phone interview.
Given his background and nationality, the director felt he had a responsibility to deal with the Holocaust era, but an equal duty not to exercise moral judgment on the Jews who collaborated in Operation Bernard.
One reason he closed the film with the scene at a Monte Carlo casino â€œwas to give Sally some redemption, or atonement, at the end,â€ Ruzowitzky said.
From his considerable research on concentration camps, he concluded that â€œthe system was designed so that the inmates would harm each other.â€
He cites one survivor, a doctor, as saying, â€œIf you tried to do anything good, it would lead to catastrophe.â€