Disquiet provoked by Premier David Ben Gurion’s sharp criticism of the Zionist movement had repercussions today in the ranks of the Premier’s own followers in the Mapai Party.
When the party’s executive met one of its members demanded a special meeting to consider what he described as Mr. Ben Gurion’s disturbing attitude–a reference to the Premier’s speech at the recent ideological conference in Jerusalem in which he lashed out at Zionists and said he himself was not a Zionist.
The demand was rejected after Giora Josephthal, secretary-general of the Mapai Party, told the meeting that a majority of the Mapai rank and file did not share Ben Gurion’s views on Zionism and Mr. Ben Gurion was aware of that fact. The Premier’s views were not recent, he pointed out, although their formulation at the conference had disturbed both Mapai members in Israel and Zionists in many parts of the world.
Mr. Josephthal pointed out that some of the concern had been caused by the unusual method Mr. Ben Gurion had used to express himself. Instead of affirming his own Zionism and attacking the others as not being Zionists, he pointed out, Mr. Ben Gurion had said that if the others were Zionists, he was not.
The furore arose over the debate in the ideological conference over the role and status of Zionism, with the Premier holding the position that to be a Zionist meant to settle in Israel. Dr. Nahum Goldmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, Moshe Sharett, former Premier, and other Jewish thinkers, argued that there was a role and purpose for the Zionist movement outside of Israel and pleaded for cooperation between Israel and the Zionist movement abroad.
The Archive of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency includes articles published from 1923 to 2008. Archive stories reflect the journalistic standards and practices of the time they were published.