The Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act was so popular in the House Foreign Affairs Committe’s markup Wednesday morning that a formal vote on the legislation wasn’t even necessary.
The bill passed by voice vote in the committee, after the vast majority of the 20 or so committee members to speak at the hearing voiced support for the legislation. The only committee members to speak out in opposition were Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) and Ron Paul (R-Texas). The bill has 330 sponsors in the House
The bill would strengthen the president’s authority to sanction companies that help Iran import or produce refined petroleum, which is seen as potentially having a large impact on Iran’s economy because the country imports 40 percent of its refined petroleum. The measure also requires the White House to report 90 days after passage, and every six months thereafter, on any person who has provided Iran with refined petroleum or engaged in any activity that would assist them in acquiring it.
Committee chairman Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.) said it marks the first time Iran sanctions legislation included such a reporting requirement. He also reiterated what he said earlier this month — that he hoped diplomacy would succeed, but in case it didn’t, it was necessary to start the legislative process for sanctions now.
For more information on the legislation, the brief can be read here.
After the jump are Berman’s remarks at the hearing, as well as AIPAC’s statement applauding the vote:[[READMORE]]
First, Berman:
In marking up H.R. 2194, I have one transcendent goal in mind: To maximize the chances that Iran, the leading state sponsor of terrorism, will be prevented from acquiring the capacity to produce nuclear arms. That capacity would pose perhaps the most serious strategic threat to our nation.
Why? Four reasons:
First, a nuclear-armed Iran would be able to bully its neighbors and dominate its region, and would be much less susceptible to pressure from the international community.
Secondly, its terrorist protégés, like Hezbollah and Hamas, would be emboldened.
Third, it would likely spark a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that would lead to the collapse of the global nuclear nonproliferation regime.
And finally and very importantly, we could never be sure that it wouldn’t share its nuclear know-how with others, including terrorists, or possibly even use nuclear weapons against Israel or other U.S. allies in the region.
This legislation seeks to target Iran’s ongoing dependence on refined petroleum imports. It is not a magic bullet, but it will – at least — force the Iranians to think twice about continuing to flout the will of the international community.
Unlike previous Iran sanctions legislation, which has been ignored by every administration, this bill requires the administration to report to Congress all activities that would trigger sanctions.
330 Members of the House, including the overwhelming majority of this Committee, are co-sponsors of this bill.
When I introduced H.R. 2194 six months ago, I said that I did not want to mark it up right away so that diplomacy could be given a chance to succeed. And I still do.
In recent weeks, there has been a potential development on the diplomatic front, as the U.S., its partners and Iran have discussed the prospect that Iran would ship 75% of its existing stockpile of low-enriched uranium outside the country to be further enriched for use in making medical isotopes. If this deal is realized, as agreed to in principle, and not with significant modifications — and assuming that Iran has no covert stockpile of low-enriched uranium – we will have pushed back Iran’s nuclear clock perhaps nine months to a year.
In marking up the bill today, we must recognize that whatever the progress on that recent arrangement, it does not address the international community’s central concern: suspension of Iran’s uranium enrichment program.
Iran is still refusing to suspend enrichment, as demanded in four separate United Nations Security Council resolutions, and has thus far not even committed to engage on that core issue in the recent round of talks. In fact, as we now know, Iran has been seeking to covertly expand its uranium enrichment program.
The Iranian government should know that the U.S. Congress remains intently focused on this issue, and that there will be severe consequences down the road should it refuse to suspend its nuclear program. That is why, after six months of waiting, it is time to begin moving this bill through the legislative process.
I am not giving up on the possibility that diplomacy will succeed in bringing about a suspension of Iran’s uranium enrichment program.
But if diplomacy does not produce the desired results within a very short period of time, there should be a robust sanctions regime imposed by the UN Security Council – or, failing that, by a coalition of economically powerful, like-minded states that, one hopes, would include the United States, the EU nations, Japan and several of the key oil-producing Arab states.
Only when we judge that these other options will not succeed in a timely manner should we turn to additional unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions such as those included in H.R. 2194.
As I said in my statement two weeks ago announcing this markup, by reporting out the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act, this Committee will take the first key step to ensure that President Obama is empowered with the full range of tools he needs to address the looming nuclear threat from Iran, even as he pursues diplomacy and, if necessary, the multilateral sanctions track. Given the length of time it ordinarily takes the House and Senate to move a significant piece of legislation to the President’s desk, it is important that we initiate this process today.
All of us are aware that if the provisions of this bill are ever implemented, they would likely have a significant impact on the Iranian economy, including quite possibly on average Iranians. While that is a distasteful prospect, the urgency of dealing with the Iranian nuclear project — and the immense danger that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose to tens, if not hundreds, of million people who will fall within the range of its missiles – compels us to go forward with this legislation. Should its implementation prove necessary, it would be our hope that the Iranian regime would come to its senses and suspend its enrichment program at the earliest possible time.
Iranians should understand that Americans, while distressed by the actions of the Iranian regime, have feelings of real friendship for the Iranian people themselves, and we believe most Iranians reciprocate those feelings. Many of us regret that developments in recent decades have created impediments to our mutual friendship.
We look forward to a day when US-Iranian friendship can blossom anew, when a government in Tehran is willing to restore Tehran to membership in good standing among the community of nations. For Iran, the first step down that path is the complete abandonment of it nuclear weapons program.
We know that sanctions can work. We have seen them work, for example, in the cases of South Africa and Zimbabwe, when it was known as Rhodesia. But they usually take time. Given the advanced state even of the overt Iranian nuclear program; given Iran’s achievements in missile development; and given persistent reports that Iran has made considerable progress on nuclear-weapon design, we have very little time to lose. Should diplomacy fail, we must be prepared.
I urge all Members of the Committee to support this bill.
And here’s AIPAC:
AIPAC applauds House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman and Ranking Member Ileana Ros-Lehtinen for their leadership in bringing forward the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act, which was marked up today and passed by the committee by a voice vote.
Cosponsored by more than 75 percent of the House of Representatives (332) and by 76 members of the Senate, this measure will enhance diplomatic efforts by President Obama and the international community to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability.
IRPSA will reinforce American diplomacy should Iran continue to defy the international community and five U.N. Security Council resolutions by continuing to enrich uranium, refuse unfettered nuclear inspections and cover-up the extent of its nuclear program . The law would force Tehran to confront a real choice: continue its illicit nuclear program and risk economic ruin or suspend the program and open the door to relief from sanctions.
During the 2008 presidential campaign, then-Senator Barack Obama backed such a move, saying, "If we can prevent them from importing the gasoline that they need … that starts changing their cost-benefit analysis. That starts putting the squeeze on them."
Iran’s economy is weak and its government hobbled following the serious blow to its legitimacy this summer as a result of the disputed presidential election and the brutal repression and violence directed against the people of Iran. Economic and diplomatic pressure is the best way to persuade Iran to abandon its illicit nuclear pursuit.
Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd and Ranking Member Richard Shelby are set to mark up comprehensive legislation in their committee tomorrow that will encompass the Senate version of the IRPSA (S.908), as well as the Iran Sanctions Enabling Act (S.1065), overwhelmingly passed earlier this month by the House by a vote of 414 to 6. This measure also contains provisions clamping down on sanctions-busting activity known as transshipment.
Key Provisions of the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act:
*Strengthens the president’s authority to impose sanctions on any entity that provides Iran with refined petroleum resources or engages in activity that could contribute to Iran’s ability to import such resources, including:
Providing ships or shipping services to deliver refined petroleum to Iran
Providing insurance or reinsurance for such activity
Financing or brokering such activity
Providing machine components to maintain or expand Iran’s refining capacity
Effectively prevents such entities from doing business in the United States by:
Prohibiting the entities from carrying out any financial transactions in U.S. dollars
Barring any U.S. person or financial institution from carrying out any transaction involving a sanctioned entity
Freezing any assets the entities may have under the jurisdiction of the United States
*Requires the president to report within 90 days and every six months thereafter regarding any person who has:
Provided Iran with refined petroleum
Engaged in activity that could contribute to Iran’s ability to import refined petroleum resources
Sold, leased, or provided to Iran any goods, services, or technology that would allow Iran to maintain or expand its domestic production of refined petroleum resources
* Urges the president to impose sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran and any financial institution engaged in proliferation activities or support of terrorist groups
